Insight

WorkMotion vs Papaya Global (Europe EOR) in 2026

A focused Europe-first comparison: compliance proof, security posture, platform clarity, and pricing transparency.

2026-02-068 minPrimary: WorkMotion vs Papaya Global
ComparisonEuropeCompliance
Search intent

If you are looking for a quick answer, the key points below summarize what teams usually need for EU hiring decisions.

  • WorkMotion vs Papaya Global
  • EOR comparison Europe
  • WorkMotion compliance certification
  • Papaya Global security
Practical note: Use this as a working checklist with HR and payroll before you finalize an EOR decision.

Quick verdict

If you prioritize independent compliance proof and a Europe-first benchmark, WorkMotion has a clearer compliance signal.

Papaya Global emphasizes enterprise security posture and a broad global platform.

Compliance proof

WorkMotion publicly references an IEC Gold compliance certificate.

Papaya Global publishes compliance and security posture, but not a named EOR compliance certificate.

Security posture

Both vendors highlight enterprise-grade security frameworks.

Use the evidence links to validate specific certifications required by your procurement team.

Platform and onboarding

Ask for a live walkthrough and confirm SSO, reporting, and onboarding time for your target countries.

Compare role-based access and audit trail availability.

Pricing clarity

WorkMotion lists a public starting price on its pricing page.

Papaya Global pricing is available via its pricing page, but confirm the exact EOR plan details.

FAQ

Which is better for Europe depth?
Choose the provider with stronger, country-specific evidence for your shortlist markets.
What should I verify first?
Entity ownership, contract localization, and payroll cutoff timing.

Sources

Next step
Compare Europe-first EORs
Build Shortlist