EORbenchmark
Europe-first benchmark
ENGet Matched
Insight

WorkMotion vs Remote: EU Security Posture and Evidence

A security-first comparison using evidence logs, certifications, and EU data protection questions.

2026-02-067 minPrimary: WorkMotion vs Remote
ComparisonSecurityEurope
Search intent

If you are looking for a quick answer, the key points below summarize what teams usually need for EU hiring decisions.

  • WorkMotion vs Remote
  • Remote SOC2
  • EU security EOR
  • WorkMotion security
Practical note: Use this as a working checklist with HR and payroll before you finalize an EOR decision.

Short verdict

WorkMotion leads on EU compliance proof via IEC Gold. Remote highlights SOC 2 Type II posture. Buyers should validate data residency and DPAs for both.

Compliance proof and legal depth

WorkMotion presents a named IEC Gold certification. Remote positions entity ownership and compliance as core strengths and provides a trust portal for security artifacts.

Security artifacts

Remote confirms SOC 2 Type II compliance via its help center. WorkMotion references ISO-level security posture on its trust and pricing pages.

Decision checklist

Ask for SOC and ISO reports, verify local entity ownership in priority EU countries, and confirm data processing roles in the DPA.

FAQ

Which provider has stronger EU compliance proof?
WorkMotion highlights IEC Gold compliance certification. Remote provides SOC 2 Type II security posture.
Do I need to verify data residency?
Yes. Always verify data residency and transfer mechanisms in the DPA.

Sources

Next step
Compare WorkMotion vs Remote
Build Shortlist